Coming soon

Daily, snackable writings to spur changes in thinking.

Building a blueprint for a better brain by tinkering with the code.

The SECOND illustrated book from Tinkered Thinking is now available!

SPIN CHESS

A Chess app from Tinkered Thinking featuring a variant of chess that bridges all skill levels!

REPAUSE

A meditation app is forthcoming. Stay Tuned.

THE LITTLE THINGS

August 19th, 2026
They say it's the little things in life: the moment when your mind clears and you notice the way sunlight dances on a leaf as it wavers in the morning breeze, the way a child quietly walks up to you with arms spread out, wanting a hug, the way the milk rises back up to the surface in your coffee, spinning in eddies.

It's the little things in life that make it worth living.

The wisdom behind the quaint statement is that it has a dark side. The little things can make life miserable. The pet peeves a partner has, the long commute, the sink always filled with dirty dishes, the empty fridge after a long day, the unmade bed, the bad sleep, the annoying coworker. They're endless, and while none of them on their own are all that impactful or even worth thinking about, the aggregated effect can be more than demoralizing: it can make for a bad life. Death by a thousand papercuts is the dark side of a coin shared by: it's the little things. . .

There's certainly something to be said for cultivating and practicing a muscle of equanimity that can generate serenity, no matter the situation or annoying facet of reality. Churchill had a great quote to this effect and it shines a light on the connection between the endless papercuts of life and our reaction to them:

A person is about as big as the things that make them angry.

All truisms gloss over some variety of nuance, no matter how perfect they might ring. Consider the source of things. If a total stranger does something annoying, like some buffoon on the road who can't seem to drive perfectly — it's an absolute waste of time and energy to give such an occurrence any thought.1 If you do, you're automatically living a miserable life: Do you pay attention to the silver linings in life? Or are you too focused on the cloud to notice?

But, if the source is something you care about, this is where the nuance comes in — this is where things get a little murky. If a beloved and much adored partner is perpetually annoyed with something you genuinely don't think is important at all. Well, to ignore it with a sense of serenity is to invite an aggravated elevation of the issue. And what does it mean to live a life that is bound to the pathways dictated by someone else's pet peeves? Well, love is compromise, right?

Love is treated as a foundation. Something to rely on, but after my own experience and a lot of observation, I think this might be a very big mistake. In my experience, love is quite fragile. I think it's no mistake that we give flowers as an expression of love: flowers are fragile, they require a very specific environment to flourish and look their best, otherwise they wilt and die, or they never even sprout. If the environment that gives rise to love isn't the constant priority, then the love will suffer. It's like the difference explored with the perennial question: Do you live to work or do you work to live? Everyone wants it to be the latter. That's what it should be. But the truth is most people live lives that are completely devoted to their job, either out of necessity and desperation, a lack of options, a lack of creativity, or pressure from obligations. In many families, the family itself becomes the pressure that creates an intense focus away from the family, and then the environment for that "love" that created the family in the first place. . . starts to degrade. 

A gardener pays attention to tiny details — the little things. The gardener gets dirty, knowing there's a specific kind of mess2 that gives rise to something beautiful: The pH of the soil, the fertilizer, the amount of sun that hits the garden, the amount of water. All of it is a delicate balance of small variables that together either give rise to a beautiful bloom, or...not. Neglecting one of them can have a huge impact. Like never really being present and listening when that increasingly frustrated family member speaks. Likewise, concentrating on the wrong details can be just as disastrous: drenching everything in pesticides so there are no bugs, failing to realize that some bugs aren't just beneficial, they are necessary.3 Everything adds up over time. For better or worse. Everything compounds. For better or worse. The gardener with those beautiful blooms knows: it's not just all about the little things, it's about giving time and attention to the little things that actually make a difference.







TIME ON PROJECT

August 11th, 2026
Time dilates in strange ways. I once wrote this: if you want to slow down time, concentrate on the moment. If you want to speed up time, concentrate on the task

The only real problem with this, is if your task is part of a big project, and you stop that task and neglect the project, time still moves swiftly. 

Without a constant source of input, projects stagnate, dead in the water. Unless it's hit some sort of escape velocity, like a business project making money with a flywheel structure, it can feel like it's still working. But further improvements? All stagnate. 

I have several projects that are multi-year, and it always shocks me when the carousel finally turns to reveal a slot of time to work on one of those projects and I ask: when was the last time I worked on this? Where was I in the process? The answer is always quickly followed by a: holy shit, how have I neglected this for so long.

Relationships can be like this too. Only that which gets constant love and nurturing grows. All else atrophies, and eventually, dies. You can see this in personal projects, relationships, even governments and civilizations. Unfortunately there is no golden plateau to hit where things magically coast, as if on golden rails that extend into the future, piercing eternity with stability. 

It's just like riding a bicycle! Is genuinely a subversive concept. People never seem to lose the ability to ride a bicycle despite not riding for years, because in the meantime, everyone is practicing the art of balancing their body as they move and walk. But rarely, if ever, do such elemental tasks that we 'practice' everyday transfer to projects and skills that we neglect for weeks and months and years. 

When I look back at Tinkered Thinking as a project, I marvel: how was I able to sustain that output? A thousand essays and a couple hundred short stories in just a few short years. Seems insane. It might seem like a haughty thing to point out, but in those short few years, I wrote more than most people do in a lifetime. That doesn't seem possible, and yet, it was just an artifact of a very simple rule: write and post something everyday. 

Luckily I was quite shameless about it because I didn't really give a shit if anyone read what I was writing. And beyond that, I didn't really think anyone would read anything I wrote. Why would they? And, honestly, why would I care?1​ 

Projects are like alternate dimensions. They wait for you, and when you step through that portal and get into the flow, time drains from both realities. But when you return to life, time still drains, but the project stands still. 

And I'm not really sure what it takes to stick the two part landing required: commitment and discipline.2​I just decided one day to post everyday because no other cadence seemed to make much sense. It's like breathing. You can't do all your breathing on Mondays and Thursdays and be set for the rest of the week. Everything atrophies way too fast. Time on project needs to have a constant rhythm, otherwise the organs of creation rot. 

In some sense I'm writing this as a reminder to myself: I already know all of this, but I'm marring this blank page to make sure my mind confronts it. You know this! But just to make sure it stings and leaves a mark: read it! Read what you just wrote! Time on project. Either you love it and nurture it, or it dies. If you're not growing, you're digging a grave. Reminds me of a quote from one of my favorite movies:

"Get busy living, or get busy dying."3







CREATIVITY & OPTIMIZATION

August 6th, 2026
Having done a fair amount of woodworking, I've had the pleasure to visit and sometimes use some really nice woodshops and there's something pretty demoralizing that I realized. People who get good at woodworking start optimizing the process — which is good, don't get me wrong. They constantly acquire more and more equipment, and the number of specialized jigs1 pile up.

I remember I was sailing up the Columbia river in Washington and I needed to have some serving mallets made in order to make some repairs to rigging. After asking around a small town, one guy said his father had an amazing woodshop and could help me out for a couple of bucks.

This old timer's woodshop was unbelievable. Easily half a million dollars worth of equipment in this space — a space mind you that was bigger than his actual house. He was full of stories and took a lot of joy in showing off all his toys. But when he finally showed me some stuff that he'd built, I was very underwhelmed.  He'd used a lathe to cut some strange shapes and when you cut them in half you'd see like... a dolphin, or a frog or something. A cool demonstration of skill, but . . . a little disappointing considering the beast of a workshop he had.

Reminding myself of the often elaborate preparations that writers "need" in order to work, I wonder if it's an elaborate form of procrastination? Shifting focus to optimization instead of the harder work: being creative

So where do we draw the line between optimization and those necessary constraints that benefit creativity?

One might argue that creativity shouldn't be optimized at all. 

But whatever form and medium creativity takes, there's always some degree of . . . tedium(?) interwoven into the process. For some this tedium is ritualistic, or otherwise beneficially meditative. And for others it becomes the sole purpose as one shifts from novel creation to optimizing the tools of creation.

There is a balance to strike, and the human spirit can run off the road in a variety of ways. Taking time away from the actual creative process to build tools for it can create genuine improvements. For example, I'm now writing this on a custom composer that I built into Tinkered Thinking. Previously, since Tinkered Thinking was my first project, it was pretty janky. I would write something in a word document and then copy and paste that into a html converter and then enter the whole thing into a database row that I managed through SequelAce. An abysmal process. I did that for over a thousand entries if you can believe it. 

And then the world of AI coding came along and I realized I could use those new powers to revitalize my old projects. And so I built this composer, and it's great, I'm actually starting to write more, and more often. The old habit is sloughing dust and gaining inertia. And I think that is the real north star of optimization. If the creation of a new tool or an optimization of an existing process adds speed and momentum to the original purpose, then it was worth the time. Of course it's always very difficult to gauge whether a detour will be worth the distraction or whether it'll just end up as time wasted.

I'm currently building some tools to make the blog->book process more efficient. I think it'll be worth the effort, because I've got at least 3 more books worth of writing that I can put out and on the store. 

Regardless of personal vagaries, the lesson was clear a long time ago: you don't want to die with a pristine workshop capable of anything and nothing to show for all that effort.

Likewise you don't want to be so hampered by inefficiencies and friction that you never get around to producing anything. There's a balance. And it's better to be lopsided on the side of creation, but it's worth it to take a step back from time to time and wonder: how can I make this easier for myself?







WHITE MIRROR IS AN AMERICAN BOOK AWARDS FINALIST!

August 4th, 2026
The title says it all. 

Yesterday I was notified that my book WHITE MIRROR, published through Infinite Books was a Finalist in the American Fiction Awards for Science Fiction!

Now, one important note: the Finalists are listed in alphabetical order — there is no implied hierarchy. I know, it's a little petty, but I was curious. So it's basically a five-way tie for second place. Which, you know what? I'm thrilled about it.


Because frankly, my expectations were extremely low. When my publisher told me they were going to submit it to a small selection of awards, I said cool but I had zero real sense that White Mirror would come close to winning anything. 


Don't get me wrong. It's not because I don't think the writing and the stories are good enough. As a finished book, I'm very proud of it. I think it has a lot to offer. But it is an unusual book. First, it's written under the pseudonym Tinkered Thinking. I assumed somewhat that this would be a ding against my odds simply because it's unusual in a way that is reminiscent of online trolls and catfish. Second, it's an evolution from The Lucilius Parables, which already has an unusual set of constraints: the same character, an admittedly flat character, and it's devoid of your usual recipe for drama.


Perhaps the most interesting part of my reaction to this fantastic news was the thought that followed up the initial emotional excitement like a caboose on a long leash: well shit... White Mirror is GOOD, but like... I can do better...


So it makes me think about the dozen-plus chapters that I have written of a novel. The shame is that a novel requires big long blocks of time, and those just don't fit into my life very well right now. Essays and short stories — I can bust those out in an hour and be pleased for what they are. But a novel is a big, complex, organic monster that requires time to get into the flow with. Or, at least, that's been my sense of it as I work on it.


Regardless, WHITE MIRROR as a finalist. That's pretty cool. And my publisher says we can now put a shiny gold sticker on the front of the book now. And, who doesn't like a gold sticker for a job well done?







UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE

August 3rd, 2026
Incentive structure is one of the most useful mental models out there. Many people, professions and areas of study focus on what ought to be, instead of what is. Economists think of consumers as rational agents, and in the old fable the frog believes the scorpion when it says it won't sting him. Asking: what is the incentive? Often strips away the needless debate and hypothesizes about human nature and cuts straight to the cold core of what is driving a particular behavior. That rational agent consumer? Yea, they buy the new big screen TV on loan. Is this a rational idea? Absolutely not. But Sunday's sport-du-jour game will look great on it and our incentive laden consumer wants that experience.

I spend a lot of time thinking about how incentives will shift in the coming decades. If AI merged with robotics can automate virtually all sectors of an economy, how do we define an economy?1If anti-aging tech reverts everyone's body back to the age of 19, what will that do to things like marriage, and family?

What would you do with infinite time and no obligations?

Personally, I can answer this question. I could answer this question all day long for a few centuries. But that's besides the point. My concern is that most people can't answer this question. 

There's a question that I liked asking on first dates. It illuminates a lot about a person, and as far as questions go, it has a high ROI:

If I gave you one billion dollars, what would you do? But here's the catch: You can spend like 50 million on hedonism and travel for a few years - until you get bored of that. But what would you do after? Oh and by the way you can't give any of it away. Not to a charity, not to friends and family or strangers. And you HAVE to DO something with it. You can't just invest it and live off the fat forever. So, what would you . . . build?

The spectrum of answers on this one is kind of insane. Some people have a laundry list of things they'd love to tackle. And each one makes for it's own juicy conversation. Others stumble to answer and end up saying something pretty tepid. The answer shows the scope of thinking. Some people are thinking way beyond the current facts of their life. Others are so bound to them it might be fare to say they are blind.

Let's take the marriage one. If we become biologically immortal, are you going to stay with your person for... ever? I'm sure some people will. But with the hormonal profile that comes with being biologically 19, do you think this is going to be the default for most people? 

What if Till death do us part... becomes... forever? 

Think about the change in incentive structure. As people get older with a partner, the sunk cost fallacy becomes entrenched, most people interpret themselves as less valuable as a mate because youth is prized in a mate, and then there's the whole issue of "getting back out there". Most people don't have extroversion as a skill that they can just turn back on. Most people are insecure and a bit introverted as a result. They feel bashful and embarrassed, and would rather just stick with what they know.

One thing that I've always struggled with is how people make decisions that affect the rest of their lives. This isn't a jab against commitment. It's more about the calculus that people run in order to initiate a commitment. Some things have incentive structures that stay stable for a long time. Hunger and eating, for example. But others can switch slowly, like a partner's attraction to you. It's multivariate, and you don't necessarily have control over all of those variables. Same goes the other way: one's attraction to one's partner. We like to think that love triumphs over these superficial issues. But an afternoon observing how things go in divorce court will reveal plainly just how impactful superficial things can be. Unfortunately, I think love is a rather fragile thing that needs a particular environment that needs to be constantly maintained, like a garden. If you want a flower to bloom, you need to maintain your garden. And Love is that flower. But instead many people treat it like the foundation of a house. We pile everything on top of it and expect it to support everything. Imagine doing that to a flower. And yet people are surprised when love doesn't prevail. Again, people think about how the world ought to be, instead of facing the world as it really is.

Behavior is predictable along incetnive lines, until further notice. That is, until the incentives change.